Good communication between people with life-limiting illnesses and their health care professionals is important for achieving a high quality of palliative care and positive end-of-life experiences for older people and their families. [1, 2] Open and sensitive communication can enhance a person’s knowledge of their condition, the potential benefits and side effects of treatments, as well as their prognosis. [1] It also presents an opportunity to explain the purpose and benefits of palliative care for the individual and the family unit. These discussions can help a person develop a realistic understanding of what the future might entail, empowering them to make active plans around any personal life goals, as well as for their future care. [3] Quality communication can also strengthen the relationship and trust between the older person and family and the health professionals providing care, increasing the likelihood the person will receive services that reflect their needs. [3]
When health professionals involve families of aged care residents in detailed discussions about goals of care and keep them updated on changes and deterioration, family members appear more likely to see the need to move from a curative approach to palliative-oriented care. [2] Clear and open communication that death is a probability for older people in aged care and that it may be impending for their loved one might, therefore, prevent families from requesting burdensome interventions near the end of life. [2, 4] Overall, the evidence suggests that open conversations at the end of life can contribute to improving a dying person’s quality of life. [5]
Whose role is it to initiate discussions of end of life?
Most older people in aged care settings express a willingness to discuss the end of life, preferring not to ‘leave it too late’ and valuing honesty and clarity in communication with health professionals. [6] These conversations may be initiated by the person, a family member, or an informal carer. They might also be introduced by a health care professional such as a registered nurse within an aged care facility [1] or the person’s regular general practitioner. [7] Ideally goals of care discussions based on a shared understanding of a likely prognosis should start 6 to 12 months before death and prior to a crisis event such as hospitalisation. [8] They should also continue to take place until the person’s death. [9]
Some older people and their families will avoid discussing end of life matters. This may be for cultural or religious reasons, out of fear of hearing a negative prognosis, or a desire to maintain hope and positivity. [10] Health care professionals may need to explore the reasons behind a lack of engagement before any end-of-life communication takes place. Once these reasons are understood, the clinician might proceed by sensitively preparing the person and their family over time for the inevitability of death, rather than trying to convey a lot of confronting information all at once. [9] Where end-of-life discussions take place is an important consideration. Comfortable, homely, and private meeting spaces well away from busy thoroughfares may offer people a better environment for expressing their emotions and engaging in frank and sensitive discussions than public areas or clinical spaces.
General practitioners who have built long-standing relationships with their patients may be best placed to perceive a person’s willingness to engage in discussions around palliative and end-of-life care and proceed accordingly. [11] However, the effectiveness of general practitioner end-of-life communication will depend on the individual clinician’s communication skills and ability to create a collaborative relationship with the patient and family. [12] Some general practitioners delay informing patients and their families of approaching death until very late. They may have difficulty identifying patients at-risk of dying [13] or be unwilling to communicate bad news in case it results in a loss of hope. [14] Some general practitioners fear that end-of-life communication may damage the patient-clinician relationship; however, it appears honest communication of this kind tends to strengthen it. [15]
For people living with dementia, the evidence suggests end-of-life conversations involving the family should start as early as possible and be ongoing. [16] This can help create a system of support around the family, providing them with time to process the terminal nature of dementia. It may also facilitate advance care planning while the person with dementia is still able to make decisions. [2, 4, 16] In a time of crisis, family members (or a non-family substitute decision-maker) may become central in communicating the person’s wishes to aged care staff or to acute care staff if the person with dementia is transferred to the emergency department or hospitalised. [17] For more information on end-of-life considerations for people with dementia, see the evidence themes Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care in the Dementia Care section of the Hub.
End-of-life communication with people from diverse cultural or ethnic backgrounds and their families requires a culturally informed approach that respects and responds to individual differences in past experiences, beliefs, and values. For example, some cultures exclude the dying person from discussions of prognosis [4] while others may have different ways of interpretating the meaning of pain, suffering and grief (e.g., as a test of spiritual faith). [18, 19] Language barriers may also come to the fore during end-of-life discussions. Professional interpreters may be necessary during these important and sensitive conversations and may be preferable to relying on family members to interpret. [18]
